DANIEL ASSA
Israel. Givatayim, 90 Shenkin St. 5330801
Email: AssaDany@Gmail.com Blog: DanielAssa.com Cell. 972-52-6553999
Israel. Givatayim: September 11, 2023
The Universe: Chapter 1 – Matter (Part b)
Nullification
An even more extreme natural phenomenon than Invertibility is the Nullification phenomenon, in which ordinary Matter seemingly disappears after an encounter with an Anti-Matter that also supposedly disappears (Energy and other particles are also created at the encounter). Anti-Matter is an ordinary Matter, only its electromagnetic charge is the opposite of that of a parallel Matter. For example: an electron of ordinary Matter carries a charge defined as negative. An electron of Anti-Matter (called a positron) carries a charge defined as positive (like that of the proton) and it is a particle with exactly the same other features as an electron.
In my opinion, and I repeat the rule that guides me, and expands it a little – nothing is ever extinct and nothing has been created out of nothing since the Big Bang. The explanation for the transformation of one Matter into another, and the explanation for the Nullification of Matter and Anti-Matter while creating Energy and other particles, lies in the change in the features of the particles due to a violent encounter between them. In some cases, new particles are created that we can recognize, and in other cases, the newly acquired features make the particles unrecognizable by us. The Matter itself does not disappear in the process, it only acquires new features that cause us not to recognize the new particles (whether through our senses or through devices). The changes in particles are mainly changes in the built-in features, such as the amount of Elementary-Matter in the new particles, density, geometry and Internal-Energy.
Duality
An important and interesting question regarding the essence of Matter is: "Is a subatomic component, such as an electron or photon, a particle (i.e., material) or a wave (i.e., not made of Matter)? opinions on this Matter were divided for many years until a very interesting, but agreed-upon answer was given.
Here are some of the arguments for and against the possible answers:
If the subatomic component is a particle, then how is it possible that various measurements reveal typical characteristic of waves only, such as diffraction, refraction, or interference?
If the subatomic component is a wave, then how is it possible that different measurements reveal typical characteristic of materials only, such as mass or atomic weight?
The surprising solution accepted by scientists today is that atomic components are both waves and particles, and different measurements will reveal different characteristics. In fact, the dominant physical theory today in the field of the smallest (as opposed to general relativity, which deals with the largest) is the Field-Theory, for which the question of wave-particle duality as no real importance. Field-Theory distinguishes particles according to their spin – spin in an integer or spin in a partial number.
I do not wish to contradict any existing scientific theory, but I would like to further emphasize that in my opinion subatomic components are first and foremost Matter, as I defined it at the beginning of this article. The measurements of various types that we make on the subatomic components reveal the initial features and acquired features of that measured piece of material. Hence, a type A measurement, for example, would reveal a characteristic such as Mass, typical to particle, and a type B measurement would reveal a characteristic such as Interference, typical to wave, and a type C measurement would reveal a characteristic such as spin which, according to Field-Theory, determines whether the particles are Fermions or Bosons.
To this I would like to add that, in my opinion, the source of the wave-like motion of Matter is the density of the Space in which it moves. Space partially inhibits the progress of Matter and causes contraction of the course of movement. Thus, a motion that is ostensibly in a straight line becomes a wave-like motion whose direction of progress is straight (of course, straight in the relativistic sense).
Light, for example, which reaches us from the distant past, is characterized by a decrease in its intensity over time. The photon goes from a powerful motion that is blue in color to a movement whose intensity is milder and red in color (of course without a change in the measured motion velocity).The reason for this is, in my opinion, a significant reduction in the density of Space that light passes, from a large density of Space due to a relatively small spherical structure of the Universe near the Big Bang, to a relatively large spherical structure after the expansion of the Universe in the billions of years since the Big Bang.
This, of course, is in addition to the effect of galaxy distancing from each other, which is also due to the expansion of the Universe.
Dark-Matter
In my opinion, Dark-Matter is an ordinary Matter for all intents and purposes. Like all Matter in the Universe, it obtained its features from the Big Bang event or acquired some of them later. For example, Dark-Matter has a mass derived from its features that causes it to respond to the presence of the Higgs field. Dark-Matter basically has the features of other materials that are familiar to us, except for one feature – Dark-Matter does not interact with photons of light; Therefore, we do not see it, but only feel its presence as a result of its involvement in the warping of Space, and because its motion is influenced by the same Space that it contributed to its curvature.
Dark-Energy
Scientists agree that Dark-Energy, despite the similarity in name to Dark-Matter, is not Matter. Therefore, I will not address this Energy here. I will devote a paragraph to this in the chapter relating to Energy.
דניאל אסא - מאמרים ודעות 