The Universe: Chapter 2 – Space (part a)

DANIEL ASSA                             

Israel. Givatayim, 90 Shenkin St. 5330801

Email: AssaDany@Gmail.com   Blog: DanielAssa.com    Cell. 972-52-6553999    

Israel. Givatayim: September 13, 2023

The Universe: Chapter 2 – Space (part a)

Essence

Space is a central component of the Universe, made of pieces of Matter. One of the most important situations in which Basic-Matter exist is in the form of tiny bodies, which I will name Space-Bodies. These bodies, being spread out in the Void (which I will name Primordial-Void) where the Big Bang took place, are by their very existence the Space. It is important to emphasize that they do not create Space, but are themselves the Space. The density of Space-Bodies is probably the maximum possible (absolute stiffness) and is due to their tiny size and lack of any complexity. Other Matter particles are larger, they are less perfect and their degree of density decreases accordingly.

The other pieces of Matter attach temporally to the Space-Bodies during their motion. The Space-Bodies are the only place where Matter can be found for measurement purpose. The basic motion of Matter, were it not for the existence of Space-Bodies, would have been in immediate velocity.  Only the delay by Space-Bodies enables measurement of distance and measurement of time.

The entire Universe can be seen as a "Space-Time field", with the creators of the field being the Space-Bodies. 

The creation of Space

Due to the lack of interaction with the basic forces in nature other than Gravity, the Space-Bodies broke through the age of darkness (which existed between the beginning of the Big-Bang and the separation of photons from the other particles) long before the rest of Matter, thus created a Space to which the rest of Matter in the Universe spread.

Explanation of astrophysical questions

These features of Space-Bodies can solve and explain a number of important astrophysical problems –

  1. The feature of mass (interaction with Higgs-Field), and the fact that these bodies are "material" may explain the missing Matter in the Universe as compared with what is observed and calculated, as the solution of cosmological equations suggests.
  2. The existence of Space-Bodies explains what is the curvature of Space due to the presence of Mass. The curvature, in a very picturesque way, is the transformation of relatively flat layers of Space-Bodies into spherical layers around the center of massive mass and also a change in their density. When another material (with mass) moves thru the Space-Bodies (from one body to another), its way changes (curvature of space) and so does the time (curvature of time).

A place in Space-Time

Space-Time is a Space in which time passes as a result of the movement of Matter andits delay by the Space-Bodies. More about time will be given in the next chapter.

A place in Space of a particle is the place of the Space-Body on which it is located at the time of measurement. This position changes constantly due to the expansion of Space and due to the movement of the particle itself in Space.

An absolute place in Space of a particle is measured in relation to the position of the beginning of the Big Bang in Primordial-Void, or alternatively in relation to the cosmic background radiation. This place is also subject to the various cosmic movements.

A relative place in Space of a particle is measured in relation to the place of other particles in the Universe, subject to the cosmic movements of everyone.

A place in Time of a particle is the same as the position of the Space-Bodies in which the body resides in the present, has been in the past or will dwell in the future. As stated in previous paragraphs, more about Time will be given in the next chapter devoted to Time.

Contrary to the insight derived from quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle, in my understanding, the place of a body in Space-Time is absolute and well-defined. But due to circumstances that I will detail immediately, there is no practical way to measure their absolute place. Relativity theory prefers the term "event" to "place" and the term "interval" to "distance".

When the uncertainty principle was discovered and mathematically formulated by Werner Heisenberg, the initial thought that came to many scientists' minds was that these were technological difficulties derived from limitations of measuring instruments, problems related to wavelengths of the particle use for measuring and the measured particle, and problems of mutual influences as a result of the surveyor's contact with the measured. Later, with the development of Quantum Mechanics, scientists realized that these were not merely technological difficulties but an inherent property of particles in nature. Ther is no possibility, and it will be impossible to accurately measure simultaneously pairs of features such as the position and momentum of a particle. Moreover, even the maximum accuracy of measuring one of the features, even when the measurement of the other attribute is completely forfeited, is limited by nature to a certain level of accuracy determined by the uncertainty principal formula. This insight and the amazing advances in understanding the structure of the atom, led physicists to come up with an interpretation, which I believe is far-reaching and incorrect.

Physicists argue that a particle has no place and momentum that can be measured simultaneously, and that the particle does not have defined place in Space at all. According to physicists, the measured position of a particle is only the point at which there is the highest probability of finding it, but the particle is also present simultaneously in places where the probability of finding it is smaller. When measuring the position of the particle, all probabilities collapse to the same point where it was measured. Again, it is important to emphasize that according to physicists, this is only where we measured the particle. Its "true" place is wherever its probability curve stretches – that is, the particle has no defined place in Space. In fact, according to this interpretation, all the particles in the Universe are spread throughout the Universe. This kind of phenomenon was defined as part of the peculiarities of Quantum Mechanics, and since it – Quantum Mechanics – was found to be highly accurate and correct, it was decided that our logic – according to which a particle has a well-defined real place in Space – was wrong. This, in my opinion, is an erroneous and distorted conclusion both in terms of the existence of place for the particle and in terms of rejecting our logic as an important tool in analyzing nature.

In my humble opinion, a particle of Matter has both a defined place and momentum, as well as other features, that the common denominator of them is an absolute and defined existence while staying on the Space-Bodies, but which we cannot accurately measure. The source of the problem is that Space-Time itself is in motion, the position of Space-Bodies is unstable in itself and is subject to statistical evaluation. Maybe in future, with the development of physics and mathematics, we will be able to be more precise in calculating the place of Matter using the four known coordinates and the addition of moving coordinates that will express the spatial changes of Space-Bodies and the motion of particles in Space-Time.

It is very important to emphasize here that a state of total rest does not exist at all in our Universe. Everything moves – the measurer, the measured, the measurement tools, and the environment in which they are located, have their own internal energies, and energies acquired from the environment. They all move within Space-Time, which in itself is in an expansion motion relative to the cosmic background radiation. In addition, every measurement process is accompanied by sending and receiving information that consumes precious time during which everyone's place has changed. The constant movement of all participants in the measurement, in addition to the lack of complex dynamic mathematics, is the reason for the need to compromise with statistical determinations, which by definition contain a certain level of uncertainty.

כתיבת תגובה