DANIEL ASSA
Israel. Givatayim, 90 Shenkin St. 5330801
Email: AssaDany@Gmail.com Blog: DanielAssa.com Cell. 972-52-6553999
Israel. Givatayim: September 27, 2023
The Universe: Chapter 4 – Energy (part b)
External Energy
Motion -The observed and measured Motion of Moving-Matter. It is not the actual Motion of the Moving-Matter itself. The Matter itself moves in a wavy form. Our instruments that measure the Motion of Matter from one point to another measure distance along an imaginary straight or curve that expresses the course of the progress of the wavefront created by the Matter. But this is only an imaginary Motion of the particle itself. Borrowing from the Theory of Relativity, it can be named as Motion measured by the observer. For this type of Energy – the Motion, there is a maximum speed limit, which is the speed of light in vacuum – about 300,000 kilometers per second.
Oscillation – the actual Motion in a wave form of the Moving-Matter in Space. TheOscillation is the true course of Motion of Moving-Matter in Space-Time. This Motion is along an imaginary wave-like curved line, with the average direction of the wavefront. The dimensions of the wave – amplitude, wavelength, frequency – are fixed within a limited and small "measuring chamber", but they vary in Space according to the forces acting on the Matter during its Motion.
Inertia – The motion of a particle that moves through Space-Time by virtue of an initial impulse received, and is in a theoretical state of absence of environmental influence – is the Inertial feature of particles in the Universe.
Particles features converting
External Energy exerted on a particle of any kind may change one or more of that particle's Internal Energies, causing it to become another type of particle.
Energy conversion
The transition from one type of Energy to another can be mathematically expressed by a conversion formula, in which on one side of the equation there will be one type of Energy and on the other side, another type of Energy and a conversion coefficient.
For example, the equation E= MC² expresses the conversion of Mass M to Energy E with the square of the speed of light in vacuum C² used as the coefficient.
The Energy E in that example consists of several types of Energies:
1. blast of Matter is – Motion Energy.
2. Frenetic Motion of particles – thermal Energy.
3. Internal Energies that cause changes in chemical elements and particles.
For example, the equation Eph = h f expresses the conversion of photon Energy Eph to its frequency f and vice versa, with Planck's constant used as a coefficient.
Dark Energy
In my humble opinion, Dark Energy is External Energy for all intents and purposes (type of motion energy). Its primary source, like any other type of energy, is in the Big Bang event. This energy participated in the expansion of the universe from the beginning. But in the earlier billions of years of the Universe, gravity halted to some extent the effect of the External Energy on accelerating the expansion of the Universe. During these years, the power of Internal Energy was great, and it concentrated mainly on the creation of particles. External Energy participated partly in the process of crystallization of particles into massive bodies such as stars and galaxies. Over time, after the production of massive bodies has been relatively reduced, a process of Mass Conversion of both types of energies (internal and external) has developed into External Energy that mainly participates in accelerating the expansion of the Universe and breaking down the Cosmic Web – this energy we call Dark Energy.
Singularity
The place of this paragraph in the order of the articles seems allegedly unnatural. But it was very important for me to write this paragraph only after I had thoroughly clarified my views on the nature of Matter (the various forms in which it appears, Elementary particles, Space and Dark Matter), and my opinions about the nature of Energy (being essentially movement of various kinds, External Energy, Internal Energy, and Dark Energy).
In modern physics, two important scientific theories dominate: One is the Standard Model (which deals with the behavior of the so-called smallest – that is, molecular, atomic, subatomic particles, etc.). The second is General Relativity (which deals with the behavior of the so-called largest – i.e., stars, galaxies, etc.).
These important theories are formulated in the form of mathematical equations that describe well the behavior of the components they handle. The Standard Model describes the behavior of elementary particles, up to and including substances and compounds that we know on a daily basis. General Relativity deals with the interrelations between Space-Time and bodies of the order of stars or larger (including planets).
As I have already mentioned in previous sections of the articles, the mathematical attitude of General Relativity to its actors (Matter with mass, Time, and Space) is as if they were continuous and deterministic. The Standard Model, on the other hand, treats its players primarily statistically and as a spot.
In the past, many attempts have been made to create a "Great Unified Physical Theory" whose equations will provide solutions to both the behavior of the large and the behavior of the small. These attempts have so far failed. A good example of failure is the attempt to describe, using equations of General Relativity, what happens at the point where the material absorbed by the Black Hole drains. Seems like such an attempt leads to absurd results that contain Infinities and other absurd. A completely identical mathematical phenomenon exists in an attempt to understand what happened in the first seconds of the Big Bang.
I am not familiar with mathematics, but nevertheless, the insights on the nature of the components of the universe (as I have described in this series of articles) lead me to the conclusion that mathematicians should try to bridge the gaps between the theories by making corrections to the equation of general relativity:
1. Formulating the equation in terms of discrete mathematics – as I mentioned in the chapter on space (part b), the effect of reformulating the equation on the results of calculations will be very small, mainly due to the small size of the spatial bodies. I cannot predict the effect of the reformulation on bringing the two great teachings closer together.
2. The singularity is described as a point, i.e., a size that lacks or almost lacks spatial dimensions. This, in my opinion, and according to the insights I gained in the series of articles, is simply inaccurate. The smallest unit of Matter has an actual size. This is probably the "Planck size" already mentioned in previous chapters. The Singularity (in a black hole, and especially in the Big Bang event) had a size that was not a spot. This size is the cumulative size, when dense and tight, of all the units of Basic- Matter in the Universe (Matter that makes up the Elementary particles, Space-Bodies, and Dark Matter). This size is an actual size, which in my opinion will completely eliminate the singularity problem and my hope is that it will also help to find the "Great Unified Theory".
דניאל אסא - מאמרים ודעות 